4 Comments

Brad, we two bodies with one brain. Everything you wrote here is accurate, but no one will ever read it. You need to tighten up the writing and aim for at most 600-1000 words/article if you wish to be read or heard. Too many references. You come across like a second year law student who assumes he will win his argument on thud factor.

I want you to be able to persuade; you must first allow others to understand you. If your objective is to feel good about what you've said, then you're no different from the SJWs you correctly criticize. You're engaging in cyberonanism. Not a pretty sight.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you for the feedback. It can be hard to evaluate oneself objectively, so it's enlightening. And I do often struggle with brevity. Maybe I'll break posts up a bit more.

Expand full comment

I want you to be heard and to succeed. I am not good at self-evaluation, and can always justify my behavior that is exactly like behavior I criticize in others. Damn my parents for raising me a High Church Episcopalian! It's not my fault!

Expand full comment
author

Haha! Thank you. That means more than you know.

Expand full comment