Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jo Ann's avatar

I look forward to reading these

Expand full comment
Anthony S.'s avatar

About that provocative Millhiser quote: I'm about halfway through the Vox article he was promoting, where his argument is that the Electoral College has led to disproportionate representation in the Senate of less populated areas.

But the motivating factor appears not to be the principle at hand, but that it has given Republicans power, including veto power "over virtually any policy decision made by a federal agency" and that Harris "is likely to be restricted by a Republican senate."

But isn't that capability the point? To advocate on behalf of constituents and push back against policies it opposes? Knowing that when Democrats are in power they will do the same? Harris is free to advocate for the policies she advocates for and persuade Republicans to support her.

Regardless of whether Millhiser's arguments are defensible in certain areas, I don't see this article being written if Democrats were in the position of having disproportionate control in the Senate. Not in light of Millhiser explaining that none of Trump's Supreme Court nominees would have passed if the Dems were given rightful control of the Senate, or that it’s unlikely that "an ideologue like Justice Clarence Thomas or an unapologetic GOP partisan like Justice Samuel Alito" would have been confirmed "if Senate seats were distributed fairly by population."

Expand full comment
35 more comments...

No posts