39 Comments
User's avatar
Clever Pseudonym's avatar

Look at how young, earnest, dedicated and passionate for Justice™ our ambitious Lie Detectives are. They don't need to read, think or debate to parse the difference between an undeniable fact and a brazen lie, they know for certain that they literally incarnate Truth in their blood and bones.

A lie is simply something stated by the other party and its evil members—Hunter's laptop, Covid vaccines, Joe's yearslong senility were all obvious lies because the claims were stated by the wrong people, who have the wrong beliefs, went to the wrong schools and vote for the wrong candidates.

The Truth™ is always only whatever the Party needs to be true on that day, in that moment, to win the day's skirmish in the eternal war of Red v Blue and lead us all to the "right side of History". (Insert obligatory Orwell quote here.)

There's only one thing for certain: our Lie Detectives already have golden resumes with Harvard, Google, the DNC, McKinsey etc sprinkled liberally throughout—none of them will ever miss a meal or a promotion or ever be caught with an unapproved thought inside their heads.

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

If only you could've worked in "Authentic Self"...with the trademark of course...

Expand full comment
Clever Pseudonym's avatar

lol yes

Expand full comment
Bill Pieper's avatar

Their ability to gaslight relies upon a massive and certainly illegal income stream via Act Blue and others, and the inherent stupidity of collectivists. We need control of the Executive at a minimum to do anything about the former.

If Trump survives, wins and is inaugurated, the DC psychopaths have already mapped out what they will do if they have either House or Senate. They know Trump admin will investigate and expose the election 2020 steal, this will end the Democrats, possibly forever, and it should. Treason should have a serious price. GOP Congress could now be exposing the weaponization of the FBI, DOJ, CIA, etc. but they are owned almost as much as the Dems by all the usual suspects, AIPAC, China, etc.

Best case scenario at this point is massive asteroid obliterating DC, nothing else will dislodge these demons.

Expand full comment
SimulationCommander's avatar

This will be the formula going forward — the US government basically admits as much when they say agencies will resume ‘misinformation’ meetings with social media companies.

x.com/jameslynch32/status/1818716704740…

According to a DOJ memo, the FBI is going to resume its "regular meetings" with social media companies ahead of the 2024 presidential election. The memo claims the FBI has established new protocols for coordinating with social media companies without violating the 1A.

Expand full comment
Frank Lee's avatar

Effing SCOTUS punting! They had their chance and blew it, I think, out of stuffed shirt ignorance.

I do think the threat of ending Section 230 protections is both a motivation for some tech companies to participate with these Democrat plants in government... but also maybe their fear of Trump and Republicans sweeping the election causes them to behave.

Expand full comment
Bill Heath's avatar

I had Joe's dementia diagnosis down pat during his first year in office. The symptoms I detected had little to do with memory. They were a flat affect, a stiffened gait, a vacant stare and expressive aphasia. The clincher was him on television gesticulating and shouting "The Thing, The Thing."

Expand full comment
Mystic William's avatar

All that. But also sudden eruptions of anger. Very Alzheimer like.

Expand full comment
Bill Heath's avatar

Alzheimer’s is a separate disease. It’s always fatal, and can only be accurately diagnosed in an autopsy. You’re right, anger is a symptom of Alzheimer’s dementia. I’m slowly slipping into non-Alzheimer’s dementia from late-onset hydrocephalus.

Expand full comment
Mystic William's avatar

I am sorry to hear that Bill. All the best.

Expand full comment
Frank Lee's avatar

If they would lie about Trump-Russia collusion, Hunter's laptop and Joe Biden's health, isn't the simple conclusion that they cannot be trusted? The next question that needs to be answered is "who are they?" And finally, what do we do about them?

Expand full comment
Ministry of Truth's avatar

It would be a real scoop to find out who is the originator of those lies and memes. I sometimes get the feeling that the rubes in the media are all talking to the same person thinking they're all talking to some different senior administration official (you never reveal your source to a competitor) who seeds memes like "sharp as a tack in private meetings". There probably is a team of leakers somewhere that craft the message and you can probably find some chat group for the people in the media who distribute/launder the lies.

For the Hunter Laptop story there are a few intelligence officials who went on record I believe. While many have implausible deniability "I never said it was Russian misinformation, I only said it looks like it!" the very least the next administration can do is check if they still have security clearance and yank that. It's never an outright lie - although when Trump plays the same game ("People tell me...") they always "fact-check" that.

Expand full comment
Frank Lee's avatar

Clearly they all get the same talking points memo. The Associated Press is a non-profit but clearly part of the Democrat media cabal. It is very interesting that as a non-profit entity based in New York City, the hub of leftist power and control, does not file a public tax return. All non-profits are required to file an annal 990 and it is public record, but for the AP, it is blank. This is conspiratorial as the 990 would show the donors to the non-profit. Also there is this... https://www.poynter.org/commentary/2024/associated-press-gannett-mcclatchy-drop-content/

Expand full comment
Ministry of Truth's avatar

About the AP and other wire services: Are they still necessary at all? To me it sounds like landline technology from a time long before the internet where reporters had to sit in (foreign) press conferences to get the statements from politicians. I don't really need someone to "report" what the Mayor of Astana said on Friday if the guy is on Twitter. And I also don't need a local newspaper that copies the national/international stuff from AP or Reuters, I would sometimes really like a local news medium that is 100% local but you always have to pay for the national/international stuff too. It fascinates me how many things in publishing still run like the internet (or television, or radio) doesn't exist.

Expand full comment
Ministry of Truth's avatar

It's enough when one or two get the "memo", they are all copying each other anyways so the rest happens organically without the participants even knowing. It also works with prices in economic theory, what looks like collusion or conspiracy is just a function of the way information spreads. The sheep in the middle of the herd doesn't have to see the shepherd to know where to go. You see this on Twitter as well, it often looks like a bot farm but you're dealing with people who are very collectivist in their thinking and want to be on the side that they perceive as the majority or at least their tribe.

Expand full comment
Catherine Brown's avatar

You'd think they'd learn to keep quiet about their deception. Seriously, why are they all so stupid?

Expand full comment
Clever Pseudonym's avatar

They are advertising their willingness to do and say anything for the Cause, that they are loyal foot soldiers and True Believers in the Long March to the Right Side of History.

Hey, anyone can hire an employee, but an employee who will say up is down and black is white? Priceless!

Inside the Blue Bubble this will be seen as heroic and admirable and all of these people will have long, successful and lucrative careers.

Expand full comment
Catherine Brown's avatar

The more devious and deceptive, the more they become "yes men", the higher they will go career wise. I saw it all the time. The people who say whatever whomever is listening to them wants to hear go up the ladder. Liars all. But promotions they got.

Expand full comment
Ministry of Truth's avatar

The flip side of this is that you'll never be truly in charge if all you have to offer is obedience. This usually creates the power vacuum that destroys the structure in the long term, anyone who can think for themselves is purged early on and then once the leader dies there is no one there to replace him/her because any potential candidate has been taken out as competition early on.

Expand full comment
Bill Heath's avatar

I have seen this in action. The leader gets rid of the potential competitors first, then the second rank jumps ship. The weakest are still around unable to get another job. Quality goes to shit.

Expand full comment
Ministry of Truth's avatar

Exactly. This isn't as terrible in the private sector because there are mechanisms to correct this and there are also incentives to not cut down internal competition, for example if you're the founder and CEO you might even want someone to take over for you because that frees you up to start a new business with your old business remaining under competent leadership. This only works when the primary motivation of the leader is not power, and it becomes a problem in a business that's already in decline because it then becomes a zero-sum game like government or to some extent academia: Everyone competes for the same positions and (sometimes dwindling) money with no real room for growth.

Expand full comment
Ministry of Truth's avatar

Because they only need their tactics to work on people who are even stupider and just as gullible. I think pointing out the tactics and having a name for them works somewhat well but it's extremely difficult to convince a person they are being conned, more difficult even than a con-job. At some point though you reach a tipping point where a person will flip completely and just assume everything is a lie, it takes a lot of truth to build trust but very few lies to destroy it. That's why I think it's dangerous to try and use their tactics against them.

Expand full comment
Catherine Brown's avatar

You are absolutely right.

Expand full comment
URsomoney's avatar

They dont think they did anything wrong - they’re delusional believing they’re doing good because it has to be good because they’re good people. Have you seen the WPATH videos?! They believed cutting up & castrating children was good because they decided it was good. They’re all godless narcissists!

Expand full comment
DE's avatar

I don’t suppose those disgusting psychopathic freaks happened to develop any wood chipper sales forecasts?

Expand full comment
Mystic William's avatar

He seems absolutely shameless. He didn’t care that he actively suppressed real information.

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

"spurious claims about the business dealings of Mr. Biden's son Hunter."

hahahahaha

Expand full comment
Ryan Gardner's avatar

Well I can go on forever about how they'd react...but I'll just keep it brief and say the sky would be falling into their half empty cups.

That said, I truly believe that this whole "misinformation" misinformation narrative is exactly what will be their undoing.

Expand full comment
Bill Heath's avatar

It will require an inquisitive press. Don't hold your breath.

Expand full comment
Ministry of Truth's avatar

I think we need some sort of translation software, the problem is using the same words but speaking a different language. For some "misinformation" means a deception (edited, I think deception is the better word than "lie"), for others it means counter-narrative. If you operate with different definitions then you never really hit the cognitive dissonance.

Expand full comment
Bandit's avatar

Who is the pink haired weirdo?!

😉😊😋

Come on people, join in! IF anyone is weird it's the

dumbocraps!

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

It took balls (and the morals of a dedicated socialist/liar) for “Tampon Tim” to call Vance and Trump “weird “.

Think how deranged his associates and worldview must be if he truly believes it….

The word “weird “ doesn’t even begin to describe much of the Democratic Party’s base and leadership….. “insane “ and “lunatic” are closer to the truth.

Expand full comment
DMC's avatar

weird is not watching porn. weird is getting married. weird is being responsible for your kids.

Expand full comment
Skenny's avatar

I may not last a lot longer on Substack, only because I'm old, and I'm worried about my blood pressure. I think it is too late already, but it is hard to accept that the United States, as opposed to Communist Aggression, nuclear war, terrorism, or even just good old fashioned Oligarchical greed, will instead meet it's demise owing to stupidity:

https://skennethn.substack.com/p/ny-times-fluff-piece-analyzed

Expand full comment
Jeff's avatar

I wonder which of these people is directing @kamala rocks! on substack?

Expand full comment
Brandon Richey's avatar

These people are absolute slime.

This is exactly the reason I decided to start my own Substack in order to directly engage this information war and destroy these lying narratives.

They may have all the resources, all the manpower, and all the money, BUT I strongly believe they can't match up to the intellectual horsepower of the freedom fighters and Patriots that engage this platform everyday.

The late Andrew Breitbart said "Politics is downstream from culture," and it's my view that when good people like yourself and many of the rest of us expose this scummy level of propaganda we are moving the needle and shaping a new culture to be less tolerant of this Nazi-like behavior.

Thank you for sharing this great write up my friend.

Expand full comment
Scott's avatar

Wow. So the sitting administration propagandized people in real time into not believing that the president was senile.

The Harris-Biden administration.

In sane times this would be a huge scandal. This gets to the core of Democracy versus Flock of Sheep.

Will anyone care that here is direct evidence that elections are rigged in real time by the people in power?

Expand full comment